<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 10 Red Flags of The Amateur Script (2)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/10-red-flags-of-the-amateur-script-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/10-red-flags-of-the-amateur-script-2/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christy		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/10-red-flags-of-the-amateur-script-2/#comment-906</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15713#comment-906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While I agree that dialog should be interesting I don&#039;t necessarily agree that it can&#039;t be straight forward. There&#039;s a lot to be said for INTERESTING albiet straight forward dialog. Too many writers, particularly independent film makers who write their own scripts, go out of their way not to write &quot;on the nose&quot;. You&#039;re left wondering if characters are talking to each other or the voices in their heads. I call these writers the &quot;try too hards&quot;.  They throw in some distracting plot device every few lines just to keep the dialog &quot;interesting&quot;. (Do you really need to do three things in between answering a simple question in order to not be too predictable?) Personally I think writing great dialog takes a lot of talent. It should hum along in a beautiful, uncluttered way.  Because lets face it, dialog can actually get in the way of the story!  And trying too hard not to be boring can be worse than BEING boring!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that dialog should be interesting I don&#8217;t necessarily agree that it can&#8217;t be straight forward. There&#8217;s a lot to be said for INTERESTING albiet straight forward dialog. Too many writers, particularly independent film makers who write their own scripts, go out of their way not to write &#8220;on the nose&#8221;. You&#8217;re left wondering if characters are talking to each other or the voices in their heads. I call these writers the &#8220;try too hards&#8221;.  They throw in some distracting plot device every few lines just to keep the dialog &#8220;interesting&#8221;. (Do you really need to do three things in between answering a simple question in order to not be too predictable?) Personally I think writing great dialog takes a lot of talent. It should hum along in a beautiful, uncluttered way.  Because lets face it, dialog can actually get in the way of the story!  And trying too hard not to be boring can be worse than BEING boring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/10-red-flags-of-the-amateur-script-2/#comment-905</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15713#comment-905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I liked the article, for the most part.  It was constructive, and should be helpful to beginners who don&#039;t want to look like beginners.  I can think of several famous exceptions to the part about too much &quot;movie logic.&quot;  Why does the Nazi officer go to the airport by himself, when all through the film he&#039;s been surrounded and guarded by other Nazi&#039;s?  It&#039;s so the hero can shoot him and get away with it.  But we accept it, because we&#039;re involved in the story, and because we want the good guy to win.

I didn&#039;t notice the missing Part Six, either, but it makes sense.  There is no Part Six, because that would be too predictable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the article, for the most part.  It was constructive, and should be helpful to beginners who don&#8217;t want to look like beginners.  I can think of several famous exceptions to the part about too much &#8220;movie logic.&#8221;  Why does the Nazi officer go to the airport by himself, when all through the film he&#8217;s been surrounded and guarded by other Nazi&#8217;s?  It&#8217;s so the hero can shoot him and get away with it.  But we accept it, because we&#8217;re involved in the story, and because we want the good guy to win.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t notice the missing Part Six, either, but it makes sense.  There is no Part Six, because that would be too predictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christa		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/10-red-flags-of-the-amateur-script-2/#comment-904</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15713#comment-904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yay!!! Finally got to read Part II! I admit I&#039;m struggling a bit with #10. But I&#039;ve set them in 1691 Ireland, so a bit of it is the nuance of how people spoke in that time and place, coupled with wanting there to be more silence than dialogue in the short film. But I discovered early on that silence doesn&#039;t necessarily move the plot forward! I just feel that the more they speak, the more wooden they seem. 

*sigh* I&#039;m working on it... :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!!! Finally got to read Part II! I admit I&#8217;m struggling a bit with #10. But I&#8217;ve set them in 1691 Ireland, so a bit of it is the nuance of how people spoke in that time and place, coupled with wanting there to be more silence than dialogue in the short film. But I discovered early on that silence doesn&#8217;t necessarily move the plot forward! I just feel that the more they speak, the more wooden they seem. </p>
<p>*sigh* I&#8217;m working on it&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karel Segers		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/10-red-flags-of-the-amateur-script-2/#comment-903</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karel Segers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15713#comment-903</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The original article on the ScriptShadow web site had 150+ comments and no-one noticed. 

Then again, I numbered them. :)

In any case: sharp eyes, Mr Hopkins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original article on the ScriptShadow web site had 150+ comments and no-one noticed. </p>
<p>Then again, I numbered them. :)</p>
<p>In any case: sharp eyes, Mr Hopkins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clive Hopkins		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/10-red-flags-of-the-amateur-script-2/#comment-902</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clive Hopkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15713#comment-902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[er, what happened to number 6?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, what happened to number 6?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-24 22:21:48 by W3 Total Cache
-->