<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Formatting Mistakes [Get Ready For The #1 Goof]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/formatting-mistakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/formatting-mistakes/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/formatting-mistakes/#comment-51159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=31355#comment-51159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Though a highly specific topic is being talked about here, there is a deeper, more general, point here worth &#039;taking home&#039;:  That screenplays are best written according to industry-agreed-upon conventions, else you risk putting a script reader off-side.  And, as David Trottier points out, above, that is one big mistake you do NOT want to make ... Especially if you are a yet-to-be-sold screenwriter.  While, from a novelist&#039;s point of view, these conventions will seem to be annoyingly rigid and confining, you simply can not afford to ignore or be ignorant of them.  I personally prefer the formatting freedom that novelists have.  But I am cognizant of the film industry enough to suffer the conventions in order to maximise the odds that my script submission will be read favourably.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though a highly specific topic is being talked about here, there is a deeper, more general, point here worth &#8216;taking home&#8217;:  That screenplays are best written according to industry-agreed-upon conventions, else you risk putting a script reader off-side.  And, as David Trottier points out, above, that is one big mistake you do NOT want to make &#8230; Especially if you are a yet-to-be-sold screenwriter.  While, from a novelist&#8217;s point of view, these conventions will seem to be annoyingly rigid and confining, you simply can not afford to ignore or be ignorant of them.  I personally prefer the formatting freedom that novelists have.  But I am cognizant of the film industry enough to suffer the conventions in order to maximise the odds that my script submission will be read favourably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-26 21:29:46 by W3 Total Cache
-->