I noticed on your blog, all the replies, have the current date. I suggest fixing this, it is misleading, I don’t like conversations that happen over YEARS.

The iron glad rule is “It must be entertaining”. Then there are guidelines, suggestions, techniques and examples. Films that ignore all guidlines, sugestions, techniques and examples usually play in very small theatres to very small audiences who often wish the writer had reached for his revolver.

I suppose the other thing with TV series is a late introduction of the protagonist will not detract from the story. We already know the protagonist from previous episodes.

That is a good example, Sarah.

I agree that Marge is Jerry’s antagonist, but I also think she is the film’s protagonist. Perhaps we have discovered a new type of character – the Protantag or the Antagpro.

I am very flattered to receive a response from you, Linda, and think that your book, “The Art of Plotting – Add Emotion, Suspense and Depth to your Screenplay” (reviewed by me on this website earlier in the year) is one of the best. Many screenwriting experts fail to explore the audience’s emotional reaction to a film, and your book rectifies this problem. I think all screenwriters should add a column to their step outlines or index cards headed: “How do I want the audience to react emotionally here?” They should then check that each scene is likely produce the desired reaction.

I can think of many films where my emotional reaction has unfortunately been indifference. I can also think of many others where the writer had me exactly where he or she wanted me.

Psycho probably goes against a few more common principles. I have a hunch Jack is keeping that one up his sleeve for later.