<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mystery Man &#038; The Art of Exposition	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Are Your Ducks in A Row? - Big City Story		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-332187</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Are Your Ducks in A Row? - Big City Story]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 01:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-332187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] and push it to the next level. If you are clear, then make sure you express it in your writing. This link will show you an example of great visual exposition. Having all your ducks in a row will make it so your storyboard artist has way less [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and push it to the next level. If you are clear, then make sure you express it in your writing. This link will show you an example of great visual exposition. Having all your ducks in a row will make it so your storyboard artist has way less [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christine Spoljar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christine Spoljar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-283&quot;&gt;Mac&lt;/a&gt;.

I laughed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-283">Mac</a>.</p>
<p>I laughed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jaleta Clegg		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-284</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaleta Clegg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great advice for any writer. Now to go bash my expositions into something more palatable to me and everyone reading my books...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice for any writer. Now to go bash my expositions into something more palatable to me and everyone reading my books&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mac		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-282&quot;&gt;Mac&lt;/a&gt;.

BTW - I don&#039;t think the line was as bad as it sounds.

It fitted in with the characters perfectly.  He was talking to the scientist and reminding her the reason they where their was for the mineral .. not to study the curiosities of the native lifeforms.

It&#039;s like my boss calling me into his office to beat into my head that I get paid to produce results, not spend time commenting on screenwriting websites.

Sure - you could argue that it is exposition, because I should know that already.  Yet somehow he needs to tell me it regularly.

Hang on - he&#039;s just calling now ...

Mac]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-282">Mac</a>.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; I don&#8217;t think the line was as bad as it sounds.</p>
<p>It fitted in with the characters perfectly.  He was talking to the scientist and reminding her the reason they where their was for the mineral .. not to study the curiosities of the native lifeforms.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like my boss calling me into his office to beat into my head that I get paid to produce results, not spend time commenting on screenwriting websites.</p>
<p>Sure &#8211; you could argue that it is exposition, because I should know that already.  Yet somehow he needs to tell me it regularly.</p>
<p>Hang on &#8211; he&#8217;s just calling now &#8230;</p>
<p>Mac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mac		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 11:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes - Cameron was aware that mountains don&#039;t float.  He also assumed the audience would know that as well.

In the original script he set that up with ... wait for it ... tedious exposition.

The summary: The mineral is a wide temperature range superconductor.  Basic physics says that a superconductor will float above a magnet. (It effectively acts as a &#039;mirror&#039; magnetically - so if you have a north pole of a magnet it will appear as an identical north pole, and so repel.  The interesting thing about this is that it tends to be self-stabilising, so the superconductor will just &#039;float&#039; rather than fly off into space)

All this exposition was cut ... just leaving references to the weird magnetic fields around the floating mountain which stuffed up the instruments.

Perhaps you would have preferred more exposition to explain this ?

Mac]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; Cameron was aware that mountains don&#8217;t float.  He also assumed the audience would know that as well.</p>
<p>In the original script he set that up with &#8230; wait for it &#8230; tedious exposition.</p>
<p>The summary: The mineral is a wide temperature range superconductor.  Basic physics says that a superconductor will float above a magnet. (It effectively acts as a &#8216;mirror&#8217; magnetically &#8211; so if you have a north pole of a magnet it will appear as an identical north pole, and so repel.  The interesting thing about this is that it tends to be self-stabilising, so the superconductor will just &#8216;float&#8217; rather than fly off into space)</p>
<p>All this exposition was cut &#8230; just leaving references to the weird magnetic fields around the floating mountain which stuffed up the instruments.</p>
<p>Perhaps you would have preferred more exposition to explain this ?</p>
<p>Mac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Oscar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oscar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-280&quot;&gt;Karel Segers&lt;/a&gt;.

Speaking of distracting floating rocks, it makes me wonder by what physics mountains are supposed to defy gravity? Didn&#039;t James Cameron study physics?

Don&#039;t want to sound like an Avatar basher though, I did have fun watching it as mindless popcorn spectacle. The Pocahontas parallels are probably intentional, wouldn&#039;t be the first time Cameron has had a history repeating plot motif; think of the endings of both Terminator flicks...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-280">Karel Segers</a>.</p>
<p>Speaking of distracting floating rocks, it makes me wonder by what physics mountains are supposed to defy gravity? Didn&#8217;t James Cameron study physics?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t want to sound like an Avatar basher though, I did have fun watching it as mindless popcorn spectacle. The Pocahontas parallels are probably intentional, wouldn&#8217;t be the first time Cameron has had a history repeating plot motif; think of the endings of both Terminator flicks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karel Segers		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karel Segers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-279&quot;&gt;Oscar&lt;/a&gt;.

Ouch. Yes, without the distraction of the floating rock that line hurts!

For many kids today, Avatar will be what Superman was back then. By the standards of my generation, in many ways that’s very poor.

Could a ‘better’ script keep a movie at #1? Possibly, if I see what Pixar have achieved. Interesting discussion.

Like you, I’m waiting for MM’s verdict. My guess: there will be blood…
(BTW: Where’s your avatar, Oscar?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-279">Oscar</a>.</p>
<p>Ouch. Yes, without the distraction of the floating rock that line hurts!</p>
<p>For many kids today, Avatar will be what Superman was back then. By the standards of my generation, in many ways that’s very poor.</p>
<p>Could a ‘better’ script keep a movie at #1? Possibly, if I see what Pixar have achieved. Interesting discussion.</p>
<p>Like you, I’m waiting for MM’s verdict. My guess: there will be blood…<br />
(BTW: Where’s your avatar, Oscar?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Oscar		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-art-of-exposition/#comment-279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oscar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=7571#comment-279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Always love what Mystery Man has to say, so eloquent and entertaining in the clarification of deceptively complex screenwriting fundamentals.

I&#039;d love to know what Mystery Man thinks about Avatar, a flick with some truly cringe-worthy exposition. &quot;This is unobtainium, its why we&#039;re here...&quot; says the evil expository device (Selfridge, as in selfish) to the good expository device (Grace, as in... oh sod it).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always love what Mystery Man has to say, so eloquent and entertaining in the clarification of deceptively complex screenwriting fundamentals.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to know what Mystery Man thinks about Avatar, a flick with some truly cringe-worthy exposition. &#8220;This is unobtainium, its why we&#8217;re here&#8230;&#8221; says the evil expository device (Selfridge, as in selfish) to the good expository device (Grace, as in&#8230; oh sod it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-31 03:58:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->