<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Judges: Week 1	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 05:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: russell		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/#comment-871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 05:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15091#comment-871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What a great concept for a recurring feature. I agree with the analysis. Even though I don&#039;t care for the Angst of a Lemming title, it does make me curious to know what it&#039;s about. Unfortunately, the logline didn&#039;t help at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great concept for a recurring feature. I agree with the analysis. Even though I don&#8217;t care for the Angst of a Lemming title, it does make me curious to know what it&#8217;s about. Unfortunately, the logline didn&#8217;t help at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: david		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/#comment-870</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15091#comment-870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah second one is waste of time, telling us nothing except that it is something that exists in well worn territory. And yeah the first one depends on the telling because it&#039;s classic.

My contribution here is to say that the existing first synopsis suggests it&#039;s a comedy because the hero is obviously weak and puts himself in a compromised situation. Jack&#039;s alternative suggestion makes it sound more like a social realist essay by removing the character&#039;s name and bringing the issue of faith into it. Sounds a lot less engaging, even though it ostensibly adds to the mix of  elements.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah second one is waste of time, telling us nothing except that it is something that exists in well worn territory. And yeah the first one depends on the telling because it&#8217;s classic.</p>
<p>My contribution here is to say that the existing first synopsis suggests it&#8217;s a comedy because the hero is obviously weak and puts himself in a compromised situation. Jack&#8217;s alternative suggestion makes it sound more like a social realist essay by removing the character&#8217;s name and bringing the issue of faith into it. Sounds a lot less engaging, even though it ostensibly adds to the mix of  elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: peter		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/#comment-869</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 04:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15091#comment-869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this article by Michael Ferris, https://ur1.ca/2ybs9, he illustrates how to write a formulaic premise proposed by some texts and how to sell your idea using Titanic as an example. Apart from the author&#039;s writing style it does succinctly show why the above two examples fail. Thnxs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this article by Michael Ferris, <a href="https://ur1.ca/2ybs9" rel="nofollow ugc">https://ur1.ca/2ybs9</a>, he illustrates how to write a formulaic premise proposed by some texts and how to sell your idea using Titanic as an example. Apart from the author&#8217;s writing style it does succinctly show why the above two examples fail. Thnxs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Di Muro		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/#comment-868</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Di Muro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15091#comment-868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Second one stinks. The first one is great, and just needs the stakes outlined in the closing sentence to be a great log line. With a good cast (and script of course) I would be very eager to see it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second one stinks. The first one is great, and just needs the stakes outlined in the closing sentence to be a great log line. With a good cast (and script of course) I would be very eager to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Love		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/#comment-867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Love]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15091#comment-867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks, this is very timely. I always find it helpful to learn from examples, to see in practice what works &#038; what doesn&#039;t.

For now, I&#039;ve got nothing to add to the judges&#039; comments. As usual, high stakes, conflict and specificity are crucial. 

I&#039;m currently crafting my own logline, as well as a synopsis, title, etc. Just for fun, I&#039;m also rewriting a screenplay to go with them :)

Keep &#039;em coming!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, this is very timely. I always find it helpful to learn from examples, to see in practice what works &amp; what doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>For now, I&#8217;ve got nothing to add to the judges&#8217; comments. As usual, high stakes, conflict and specificity are crucial. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently crafting my own logline, as well as a synopsis, title, etc. Just for fun, I&#8217;m also rewriting a screenplay to go with them :)</p>
<p>Keep &#8217;em coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jamie		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-judges-week-1/#comment-866</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=15091#comment-866</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow, I agreed with the polls. This is great fun. Thanks judges. Very helpful to me, as I&#039;m trying to come up with a good logline for the thriller I just wrote.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I agreed with the polls. This is great fun. Thanks judges. Very helpful to me, as I&#8217;m trying to come up with a good logline for the thriller I just wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-25 12:14:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->