<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Sequence Approach	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Room to Dream &#8211; Mark McElroy		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-370043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Room to Dream &#8211; Mark McElroy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2021 21:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-370043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] was also the first book that pointed me to “the sequencing paradigm” — a screenwriting technique that builds a screenplay from scenes sketched out on seventy [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was also the first book that pointed me to “the sequencing paradigm” — a screenwriting technique that builds a screenplay from scenes sketched out on seventy [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Deadline Approach - The Story DepartmentThe Story Department		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-332658</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Deadline Approach - The Story DepartmentThe Story Department]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-332658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] herein, episodic in nature. There is much use of high stakes/big desire dramatic tension within the sequences of the film, but not in the film as a whole. Instead, the film plays out as a countdown to the end of the tour [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] herein, episodic in nature. There is much use of high stakes/big desire dramatic tension within the sequences of the film, but not in the film as a whole. Instead, the film plays out as a countdown to the end of the tour [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karel Segers		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-36883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karel Segers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-36883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-36864&quot;&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Mike - You&#039;re right that there&#039;s only 20p. of &#039;theory&#039; in the book; but I wouldn&#039;t call the rest &#039;filler&#039;.

The analyses are the most useful part to me as it illustrates how things work. Often students read the &#039;rules&#039;, yet remain incapable of taking any learning from it. The 10 movies are a broad cross-section of genres and eras and everyone will find at least one favourite.

You recommend searching on the internet... It&#039;s the last thing I recommend to my students as the sources are often dubious and/or contradictory. Gulino takes great care in giving his statements context.

Ultimately, in my view the only practical tools to analyse stories and films are dramatic tension and hero&#039;s journey. Everything else is really derivative. Gulino sticks to the core essentials of dramatic tension and his book shines in simplicity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-36864">Mike</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Mike &#8211; You&#8217;re right that there&#8217;s only 20p. of &#8216;theory&#8217; in the book; but I wouldn&#8217;t call the rest &#8216;filler&#8217;.</p>
<p>The analyses are the most useful part to me as it illustrates how things work. Often students read the &#8216;rules&#8217;, yet remain incapable of taking any learning from it. The 10 movies are a broad cross-section of genres and eras and everyone will find at least one favourite.</p>
<p>You recommend searching on the internet&#8230; It&#8217;s the last thing I recommend to my students as the sources are often dubious and/or contradictory. Gulino takes great care in giving his statements context.</p>
<p>Ultimately, in my view the only practical tools to analyse stories and films are dramatic tension and hero&#8217;s journey. Everything else is really derivative. Gulino sticks to the core essentials of dramatic tension and his book shines in simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-36864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-36864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It still amazes me why people recommend G.&#039;s book so highly. It literally contains a chapter, maybe two, of useful information, and the rest is just filler we&#039;ve all heard before to make the actual useful information into a book. Hell, everything useful in it can be found on the internet for free. I mean, it&#039;s a useful book if you have no inkling of the 8 sequence method, but if you do, then you pretty much already know everything you&#039;ll &#039;learn&#039; about it from the book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still amazes me why people recommend G.&#8217;s book so highly. It literally contains a chapter, maybe two, of useful information, and the rest is just filler we&#8217;ve all heard before to make the actual useful information into a book. Hell, everything useful in it can be found on the internet for free. I mean, it&#8217;s a useful book if you have no inkling of the 8 sequence method, but if you do, then you pretty much already know everything you&#8217;ll &#8216;learn&#8217; about it from the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Experiment in the Bare Bones of Storytelling : Pirates of the Caribbean Sequel Trilogy, part 3 &#124; J. Nelson Leith		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-10037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Experiment in the Bare Bones of Storytelling : Pirates of the Caribbean Sequel Trilogy, part 3 &#124; J. Nelson Leith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-10037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] it turned out, the exercise is also a good example of how to incorporate the eight-sequence method, Brian McDonald&#8217;s &#8220;invisible ink,&#8221; and elements of Blake Snyder&#8217;s beat [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] it turned out, the exercise is also a good example of how to incorporate the eight-sequence method, Brian McDonald&#8217;s &#8220;invisible ink,&#8221; and elements of Blake Snyder&#8217;s beat [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mikiyas efram		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikiyas efram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[wow wow wow  i am  really really in need !!! to know more about the sequnce aproch so wats the secret ?????  so email me  mikiyasefram@yahoo.com  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow wow wow  i am  really really in need !!! to know more about the sequnce aproch so wats the secret ?????  so email me  <a href="mailto:mikiyasefram@yahoo.com">mikiyasefram@yahoo.com</a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bits of film. &#171; Extravagant delight		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bits of film. &#171; Extravagant delight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Finally, a sequence of  film  is a distinct narrative unit formed by a series of scenes, usually linked together by a pattern such as unity of time or location. In the early days of cinema, technical matters forced screenwriters to divide their stories into sequences, each the length of a reel (approximately ten minutes). This fact triggered Frank Daniel to develop a system mimicking that early style, known as the sequence approach to screenwriting. Basically, it consists in spliting the film in sequences that serve as &#8220;mini-film&#8221;, each with their own compressed three-act structure. The first two sequences combine to form the film&#8217;s first act. The next four create the film&#8217;s second act. The final two sequences complete the resolution and dénouement of the story. Each sequence&#8217;s resolution creates the situation which sets up the next sequence. For those interested, more details here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Finally, a sequence of  film  is a distinct narrative unit formed by a series of scenes, usually linked together by a pattern such as unity of time or location. In the early days of cinema, technical matters forced screenwriters to divide their stories into sequences, each the length of a reel (approximately ten minutes). This fact triggered Frank Daniel to develop a system mimicking that early style, known as the sequence approach to screenwriting. Basically, it consists in spliting the film in sequences that serve as &#8220;mini-film&#8221;, each with their own compressed three-act structure. The first two sequences combine to form the film&#8217;s first act. The next four create the film&#8217;s second act. The final two sequences complete the resolution and dénouement of the story. Each sequence&#8217;s resolution creates the situation which sets up the next sequence. For those interested, more details here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack Brislee		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Brislee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-369&quot;&gt;Margit&lt;/a&gt;.

Gulino does not present the theory as his own and does acknowledge Frank Daniel.  In the preface he states &quot;Luckily, at USC, I learned the craft of screenwriting from one of the form&#039;s master educators, Frank Daniel, who designed the program&#039;s curriculum around the sequence method.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-369">Margit</a>.</p>
<p>Gulino does not present the theory as his own and does acknowledge Frank Daniel.  In the preface he states &#8220;Luckily, at USC, I learned the craft of screenwriting from one of the form&#8217;s master educators, Frank Daniel, who designed the program&#8217;s curriculum around the sequence method.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karel Segers		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karel Segers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-369&quot;&gt;Margit&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you for your comment, Margit.

I believe Gulino was a student of Daniel&#039;s and he surely gives due credit to his mentor.

Personally I&#039;m a great fan of Frank Daniel&#039;s approach and regularly go back to THE TOOLS OF SCREENWRITING, which is very different from THE SEQUENCE APPROACH.

I&#039;m not familiar with the other book you mention but will keep an eye out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-369">Margit</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment, Margit.</p>
<p>I believe Gulino was a student of Daniel&#8217;s and he surely gives due credit to his mentor.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;m a great fan of Frank Daniel&#8217;s approach and regularly go back to THE TOOLS OF SCREENWRITING, which is very different from THE SEQUENCE APPROACH.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with the other book you mention but will keep an eye out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Margit		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/the-sequence-approach/#comment-369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8404#comment-369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 8-sequence method was once called the Frank Daniel method... I hope Gulino is not presenting this theory as his own. 
David Howard has also written down some of Frank Daniel&#039;s theories. I imagine there might be a lot of similarities between this book and &quot;How to Build a Great Screenplay&quot; and &quot;The Tools of Screenwriting&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8-sequence method was once called the Frank Daniel method&#8230; I hope Gulino is not presenting this theory as his own.<br />
David Howard has also written down some of Frank Daniel&#8217;s theories. I imagine there might be a lot of similarities between this book and &#8220;How to Build a Great Screenplay&#8221; and &#8220;The Tools of Screenwriting&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-24 12:23:15 by W3 Total Cache
-->