<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What just happened??	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Emily		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Academy Award for Best Script: The Hurt Locker
 
Academy Award for Best Movie: The Hurt Locker....
 
PLEASE EXPLAIN?
 
When Avatar was released, James Cameron said not only was the pre production so involved and the wait for the technology took so long but Avatar was before its time to be released any earlier.
Obviously the world proved that when finally made- it was ready by grossing over $2B. 
So my other curiosity and question is- although Avatar was ready for the public, was it still premature for the Academy Awards?
 
Was the rawness of The Hurt Locker what captivated them along with the possible politics that follow it (considering it is a current war)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Academy Award for Best Script: The Hurt Locker</p>
<p>Academy Award for Best Movie: The Hurt Locker&#8230;.</p>
<p>PLEASE EXPLAIN?</p>
<p>When Avatar was released, James Cameron said not only was the pre production so involved and the wait for the technology took so long but Avatar was before its time to be released any earlier.<br />
Obviously the world proved that when finally made- it was ready by grossing over $2B.<br />
So my other curiosity and question is- although Avatar was ready for the public, was it still premature for the Academy Awards?</p>
<p>Was the rawness of The Hurt Locker what captivated them along with the possible politics that follow it (considering it is a current war)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben Racicot		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-471</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Racicot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more. I was appalled when it received its win and against such a break though script- &#039;Inglorious Basterds&#039;. The January issue of Script mag had a discussion on the &quot;Oscar Race&quot; regarding many films and their writers. It explains Mark &quot;Boal spent three weeks in 2001 witnessing a bomb squad at work.&quot; I believe that sums up what&#039;s wrong here. It&#039;s a movie surrounding a hot situation. But legitimately the story was basic in my eyes. Compared to its competition it IS basic story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I was appalled when it received its win and against such a break though script- &#8216;Inglorious Basterds&#8217;. The January issue of Script mag had a discussion on the &#8220;Oscar Race&#8221; regarding many films and their writers. It explains Mark &#8220;Boal spent three weeks in 2001 witnessing a bomb squad at work.&#8221; I believe that sums up what&#8217;s wrong here. It&#8217;s a movie surrounding a hot situation. But legitimately the story was basic in my eyes. Compared to its competition it IS basic story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Jones		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-470</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-470</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-467&quot;&gt;Jeremy&lt;/a&gt;.

The supermarket scene was not only banal it was a direct copy of a scene from the superb BBC miniseries &#039;Warriors&#039; about UK Paratroopers serving in Kosovo under the UN peace-keeping.

If you want to see the &#039;solider displaced into the domestic, strangely longing for &#039; done right, have a watch. Hurt Locker is a poor second cousin.

But maybe you have to be American to appreciate this film? Maybe Im missing something by not being a US flag-waver. Maybe there&#039;s something reassuring or challenging in this film that i cant access...?

Or maybe it just plays to safe conservative audiences who really only want the illusion of having their perspectives on conflict challenged? Because in terms of great films about war that open minds and challenge beliefs, Hurt Locker is an empty vessel. 

Mike Jones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-467">Jeremy</a>.</p>
<p>The supermarket scene was not only banal it was a direct copy of a scene from the superb BBC miniseries &#8216;Warriors&#8217; about UK Paratroopers serving in Kosovo under the UN peace-keeping.</p>
<p>If you want to see the &#8216;solider displaced into the domestic, strangely longing for &#8216; done right, have a watch. Hurt Locker is a poor second cousin.</p>
<p>But maybe you have to be American to appreciate this film? Maybe Im missing something by not being a US flag-waver. Maybe there&#8217;s something reassuring or challenging in this film that i cant access&#8230;?</p>
<p>Or maybe it just plays to safe conservative audiences who really only want the illusion of having their perspectives on conflict challenged? Because in terms of great films about war that open minds and challenge beliefs, Hurt Locker is an empty vessel. </p>
<p>Mike Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Jones		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-469</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am astounded by this film. 
Astounded by its banality. 
Astounded by its disturbing lack of having anything at all to say. 

Upon walking out of the cinema i found myself completely devoid of any insight into the the lives and perspectives of Bomb Disposal experts, I was devoid of any new understanding of the Iraq war, I was utterly devoid of any new comprehension of the nature of modern conflict.

So please tell me what the point was?

Hurt Locker is a film where a whole lota stuff happens TO the characters but the characters themselves actually dont DO anything at all. They just walk around having random stuff happen to them and at the end are exactly the same as when they started. 

And please dont try and tell me thats&#039; the point. Banality is no way to make a point. 

After the superb Three Kings anyone making a movie about US troops in Iraq better come up with something new to say or else risk making a disposable and forgettable film.

This film is eminently forgettable and 2 years form now will be a hot topic of discussion Nowhere.  

And if I have to suffer through one more cliche &#039;Crying with Emotional Distress in the Shower&#039; scene again Im gonna puke! Best screenplay Oscar my arse...

Mike Jones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am astounded by this film.<br />
Astounded by its banality.<br />
Astounded by its disturbing lack of having anything at all to say. </p>
<p>Upon walking out of the cinema i found myself completely devoid of any insight into the the lives and perspectives of Bomb Disposal experts, I was devoid of any new understanding of the Iraq war, I was utterly devoid of any new comprehension of the nature of modern conflict.</p>
<p>So please tell me what the point was?</p>
<p>Hurt Locker is a film where a whole lota stuff happens TO the characters but the characters themselves actually dont DO anything at all. They just walk around having random stuff happen to them and at the end are exactly the same as when they started. </p>
<p>And please dont try and tell me thats&#8217; the point. Banality is no way to make a point. </p>
<p>After the superb Three Kings anyone making a movie about US troops in Iraq better come up with something new to say or else risk making a disposable and forgettable film.</p>
<p>This film is eminently forgettable and 2 years form now will be a hot topic of discussion Nowhere.  </p>
<p>And if I have to suffer through one more cliche &#8216;Crying with Emotional Distress in the Shower&#8217; scene again Im gonna puke! Best screenplay Oscar my arse&#8230;</p>
<p>Mike Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bernard		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-468</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-468</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-449&quot;&gt;Romain1138&lt;/a&gt;.

LOL, True Lies.... &quot;You&#039;re Fired&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-449">Romain1138</a>.</p>
<p>LOL, True Lies&#8230;. &#8220;You&#8217;re Fired&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremy		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-467</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My two cents: the supermarket scene is the most important scene in the film.  That&#039;s the key that unlocks the whole film for me.  And, for me, that scene (and how everything built up to and reflected off that) is brilliant, so much more brilliant than anything else I saw all year, that it deserved to win Best Film just for that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My two cents: the supermarket scene is the most important scene in the film.  That&#8217;s the key that unlocks the whole film for me.  And, for me, that scene (and how everything built up to and reflected off that) is brilliant, so much more brilliant than anything else I saw all year, that it deserved to win Best Film just for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lee@talentedevilgenius.com		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lee@talentedevilgenius.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They all seem to be &#039;good&#039; films, but I think it won an Oscar due to the competition up against it. I enjoyed Hurt Locker but it really wasn&#039;t Oscar winning compared to past film winners. It just stood out against the other &#039;good films&#039;. Didn&#039;t mean it was great, just stood out from the others. 

In my opinion, Up should have won in place of Hurt Locker. That&#039;s a film that&#039;ll get playback for years to come.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They all seem to be &#8216;good&#8217; films, but I think it won an Oscar due to the competition up against it. I enjoyed Hurt Locker but it really wasn&#8217;t Oscar winning compared to past film winners. It just stood out against the other &#8216;good films&#8217;. Didn&#8217;t mean it was great, just stood out from the others. </p>
<p>In my opinion, Up should have won in place of Hurt Locker. That&#8217;s a film that&#8217;ll get playback for years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-465</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pleased that you posted this question Karel, I was extremely disappointed with the Best Film and Best Original Screenplay winners. 

IMHO Avatar absolutely deserved to win Best Picture - epic scale, mythic storytelling, spectacular world crafting, futuristic concepts, contemporary themes, profound meaning and ground breaking immersive technology. Avatar is a masterpiece that changes cinema and the way cinema is made. It stands as the most impressive cinema experience of my lifetime, so I will certainly remember it for decades. I saw the film without experiencing any hype, ie - no spoilers, previews, trailers, TV specials or articles (no easy task). So when the lights dimmed I was completely transported to Pandora and drawn into the struggle of the Navi. The anti-colonial, anti-military, anti-corporate message had profound resonance with me and I responded to Jake as a character, his inner conflict and his journey. I was impressed enough to see it three times in 3D, including IMAX and to pay for my entire extended family to see it Gold Class. This is a movie going event, cinematic story-telling at its most powerful.

Naturally I was surprised at the backlash surrounding Avatar&#039;s release. After many debates and discussions I am left with the impression that the over-criticism is exacerbated by the hype surrounding the film and the persona of James Cameron himself. Couple this effect with the rivalry between ex-partners (plus the first female director issue) and it goes some way to explaining why Avatar didn&#039;t win Best Picture. Cameron also shot himself in the foot by previously proclaiming &quot;I&#039;m the King of the World!&quot; ... there goes Best Director.

I never understood the rave reviews for Hurt Locker. I felt it was entirely unimpressive - another war movie about &quot;the tragedy of war&quot; (yawn). It focused on a psychotic central character addicted to adrenalin, risking his life (and others) for his dependency. IMHO it was fairly suspenseful, well shot and the performances were good ... thats it. I certainly did not think it was memorable, moving or deserving of a nomination, let alone winning Best Picture or Best Original Screenplay. I was more moved by war films such as Saving Private Ryan, Apocalypse Now, Platoon and Black Hawk Down. In fact I have yet to see a truly compelling film set in the Iraq conflict ... perhaps that is a reflection of the politics behind Bush&#039;s &quot;War on Terror&quot;?

As far as Best Original Screenplay nominations, I thought District 9 was an extremely original, complex, interesting and well crafted screenplay. The themes of racial prejudice and xenophobia were explored in interesting ways within a truly unique Science Fiction scenario. District 9 is an important genre film and I felt it deserved more recognition.

Inglorious Basterds was also a better candidate for Best Original Screenplay. As irritating as Tarantino is as a person, you have to marvel at his dialogue.

So after the ceremony I also thought &quot;what just happened??&quot;. I am personally left with the impression that the Academy Awards were more about Hollywood politics than recognition of cinematic achievement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pleased that you posted this question Karel, I was extremely disappointed with the Best Film and Best Original Screenplay winners. </p>
<p>IMHO Avatar absolutely deserved to win Best Picture &#8211; epic scale, mythic storytelling, spectacular world crafting, futuristic concepts, contemporary themes, profound meaning and ground breaking immersive technology. Avatar is a masterpiece that changes cinema and the way cinema is made. It stands as the most impressive cinema experience of my lifetime, so I will certainly remember it for decades. I saw the film without experiencing any hype, ie &#8211; no spoilers, previews, trailers, TV specials or articles (no easy task). So when the lights dimmed I was completely transported to Pandora and drawn into the struggle of the Navi. The anti-colonial, anti-military, anti-corporate message had profound resonance with me and I responded to Jake as a character, his inner conflict and his journey. I was impressed enough to see it three times in 3D, including IMAX and to pay for my entire extended family to see it Gold Class. This is a movie going event, cinematic story-telling at its most powerful.</p>
<p>Naturally I was surprised at the backlash surrounding Avatar&#8217;s release. After many debates and discussions I am left with the impression that the over-criticism is exacerbated by the hype surrounding the film and the persona of James Cameron himself. Couple this effect with the rivalry between ex-partners (plus the first female director issue) and it goes some way to explaining why Avatar didn&#8217;t win Best Picture. Cameron also shot himself in the foot by previously proclaiming &#8220;I&#8217;m the King of the World!&#8221; &#8230; there goes Best Director.</p>
<p>I never understood the rave reviews for Hurt Locker. I felt it was entirely unimpressive &#8211; another war movie about &#8220;the tragedy of war&#8221; (yawn). It focused on a psychotic central character addicted to adrenalin, risking his life (and others) for his dependency. IMHO it was fairly suspenseful, well shot and the performances were good &#8230; thats it. I certainly did not think it was memorable, moving or deserving of a nomination, let alone winning Best Picture or Best Original Screenplay. I was more moved by war films such as Saving Private Ryan, Apocalypse Now, Platoon and Black Hawk Down. In fact I have yet to see a truly compelling film set in the Iraq conflict &#8230; perhaps that is a reflection of the politics behind Bush&#8217;s &#8220;War on Terror&#8221;?</p>
<p>As far as Best Original Screenplay nominations, I thought District 9 was an extremely original, complex, interesting and well crafted screenplay. The themes of racial prejudice and xenophobia were explored in interesting ways within a truly unique Science Fiction scenario. District 9 is an important genre film and I felt it deserved more recognition.</p>
<p>Inglorious Basterds was also a better candidate for Best Original Screenplay. As irritating as Tarantino is as a person, you have to marvel at his dialogue.</p>
<p>So after the ceremony I also thought &#8220;what just happened??&#8221;. I am personally left with the impression that the Academy Awards were more about Hollywood politics than recognition of cinematic achievement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Di Muro		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-464</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Di Muro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Everyone&#039;s an expert. Right?

Best Picture award is political. We all know that. Why do we waste time arguing which was best picture? The award itself is stupid. Everyone loves a different movie for different reasons. I have yet to see a set of &quot;selection criteria&quot; that defines the Best Picture award at the Oscars. So the judges will make a decision and give an award. It doesn&#039;t actually mean that movie is the best movie of the year.

Oscars are about politics and boosting people&#039;s careers, not about some objective truth. Relax and keep creating!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone&#8217;s an expert. Right?</p>
<p>Best Picture award is political. We all know that. Why do we waste time arguing which was best picture? The award itself is stupid. Everyone loves a different movie for different reasons. I have yet to see a set of &#8220;selection criteria&#8221; that defines the Best Picture award at the Oscars. So the judges will make a decision and give an award. It doesn&#8217;t actually mean that movie is the best movie of the year.</p>
<p>Oscars are about politics and boosting people&#8217;s careers, not about some objective truth. Relax and keep creating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Denis		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/what-just-happened/#comment-463</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8739#comment-463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m certain that a movie about war is a non-risk enterprise because everyone will like it just because it is about war. Yes, the Hurt Locker is pretty good, actors play nice and speak supposedly philosophical lines as they should but, people, haven&#039;t we seen it all? There are thousands of films out there about how hard the life of a military is and they all are about pretty much the same things, same values, same choices. Whenever there&#039;s any kind of military stuff on the dvd cover I just skip it. Why? Because, I know, it&#039;s gonna be utterly boring. Well, I can&#039;t help admitting that such movies ARE needed to educate teens but they can&#039;t impress me personally. Not anymore. I&#039;ve seen so many of them. Yes, some were really fascinating. But, honestly, what kind of new message does the Hurt Locker have to tell us? Or, what new has it brought to the cinematography? Another military story? I&#039;m quite sure that in 20 years no one will remember THL. Although Avatar may also not have a very original message it is the movie people will be willing to dive into and experience over and over again. And, I think, this what &quot;the best picture&quot; means.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certain that a movie about war is a non-risk enterprise because everyone will like it just because it is about war. Yes, the Hurt Locker is pretty good, actors play nice and speak supposedly philosophical lines as they should but, people, haven&#8217;t we seen it all? There are thousands of films out there about how hard the life of a military is and they all are about pretty much the same things, same values, same choices. Whenever there&#8217;s any kind of military stuff on the dvd cover I just skip it. Why? Because, I know, it&#8217;s gonna be utterly boring. Well, I can&#8217;t help admitting that such movies ARE needed to educate teens but they can&#8217;t impress me personally. Not anymore. I&#8217;ve seen so many of them. Yes, some were really fascinating. But, honestly, what kind of new message does the Hurt Locker have to tell us? Or, what new has it brought to the cinematography? Another military story? I&#8217;m quite sure that in 20 years no one will remember THL. Although Avatar may also not have a very original message it is the movie people will be willing to dive into and experience over and over again. And, I think, this what &#8220;the best picture&#8221; means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-30 07:28:24 by W3 Total Cache
-->