<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Writing With a Partner	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/writing-partner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/writing-partner/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 06:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/writing-partner/#comment-38854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 06:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=31291#comment-38854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steve Kaire makes sensible points here.  Though I think, in 90% of cases, a 50/50 split in creative input and credit is a big disaster risk.  Better to have a &#039;dominant&#039; writer and an essentially &#039;assistant&#039; one to make sure that the overall vision and coherence of the story remains sound.  I don&#039;t say that it is absolutely impossible for a 50/50 partnership to work.  But that would require a super-exceptionally well-matched pair (or trio or quartet) of writers to work together ... Not impossible, but very unlikely.  

I think a less risky and more effective approach would be to have trusted friends or colleagues serving as advisers and  sounding boards, rather than as co-writers.  This way the end story is more likely to be a coherent, compelling, and unified piece that is not compromised nor fractured by differing agendas or angles of interpretation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Kaire makes sensible points here.  Though I think, in 90% of cases, a 50/50 split in creative input and credit is a big disaster risk.  Better to have a &#8216;dominant&#8217; writer and an essentially &#8216;assistant&#8217; one to make sure that the overall vision and coherence of the story remains sound.  I don&#8217;t say that it is absolutely impossible for a 50/50 partnership to work.  But that would require a super-exceptionally well-matched pair (or trio or quartet) of writers to work together &#8230; Not impossible, but very unlikely.  </p>
<p>I think a less risky and more effective approach would be to have trusted friends or colleagues serving as advisers and  sounding boards, rather than as co-writers.  This way the end story is more likely to be a coherent, compelling, and unified piece that is not compromised nor fractured by differing agendas or angles of interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-26 07:34:44 by W3 Total Cache
-->