<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Best o/t Web 28 Feb 10	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/</link>
	<description>Story. Screenplay. Sale.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:52:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Karel Segers		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karel Segers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8596#comment-380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-379&quot;&gt;Richard Hyde&lt;/a&gt;.

You win.

Was talking to a friend the other day and I brought up Julie&#039;s article. He thought the current trend in screenwriting is exactly the opposite: tight, fast, economical. 

I think the technique Julie mentions is effective only in a very few scenes of most screenplays.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-379">Richard Hyde</a>.</p>
<p>You win.</p>
<p>Was talking to a friend the other day and I brought up Julie&#8217;s article. He thought the current trend in screenwriting is exactly the opposite: tight, fast, economical. </p>
<p>I think the technique Julie mentions is effective only in a very few scenes of most screenplays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Hyde		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Hyde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8596#comment-379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-378&quot;&gt;Karel Segers&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m not sure I endorse the logic in your last line lol

The whole thing, apple and all, smells to high heaven!

Seriously though, even if it is out of context, it&#039;s a &quot;dangerous&quot; article if anyone, not knowing any better, takes it as gospel. Shiny, fragrant, blood red apples could abound ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-378">Karel Segers</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I endorse the logic in your last line lol</p>
<p>The whole thing, apple and all, smells to high heaven!</p>
<p>Seriously though, even if it is out of context, it&#8217;s a &#8220;dangerous&#8221; article if anyone, not knowing any better, takes it as gospel. Shiny, fragrant, blood red apples could abound &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karel Segers		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karel Segers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8596#comment-378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-377&quot;&gt;Richard Hyde&lt;/a&gt;.

(LOL)

Admitted, without Julie&#039;s full explanation it doesn&#039;t seem to make much sense.

As a rule: what the audience can&#039;t see or hear should not be in the screenplay.

But Julie knows what she&#039;s talking about so there must be a good reason for it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-377">Richard Hyde</a>.</p>
<p>(LOL)</p>
<p>Admitted, without Julie&#8217;s full explanation it doesn&#8217;t seem to make much sense.</p>
<p>As a rule: what the audience can&#8217;t see or hear should not be in the screenplay.</p>
<p>But Julie knows what she&#8217;s talking about so there must be a good reason for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Hyde		</title>
		<link>https://www.thestorydepartment.com/best-ot-web-28-feb-10/#comment-377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Hyde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thestorydepartment.com/?p=8596#comment-377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I confess to being a little perplexed by the &quot;three S&#039;s&quot; article. We&#039;re putting &quot;smells&quot; in screenplays now? How&#039;s that work out exactly? And the suggested use of songs titles by little known Swedish bands? And flowery adjectives? Unless it&#039;s critical for the story, surely an apple&#039;s an apple, no?

Strange article ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess to being a little perplexed by the &#8220;three S&#8217;s&#8221; article. We&#8217;re putting &#8220;smells&#8221; in screenplays now? How&#8217;s that work out exactly? And the suggested use of songs titles by little known Swedish bands? And flowery adjectives? Unless it&#8217;s critical for the story, surely an apple&#8217;s an apple, no?</p>
<p>Strange article &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.thestorydepartment.com @ 2026-01-25 08:57:49 by W3 Total Cache
-->